What can we help you find?

Frequently searched

Henrique Correa

Henrique Correa, Ph.D.

Steinmetz Professor of Operations Management

At Crummer we don’t merely teach ‘management.’ Rather, we – faculty and staff – work together to create a near perfect environment for our students to develop into effective managers and entrepreneurs. The high caliber and vast experience of our faculty together with the small class sizes allow for a personal and interactive learning environment for our students who are constantly encouraged and challenged to realize their full potential as business leaders. As a professor, it is very rewarding to be part of such rich learning environment.

Henrique Correa is the Steinmetz Chair of Management and Professor of Operations Management at the Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College. His research focuses on global supply chain management, flexible operations, and operations strategy. 

Dr. Correa previously taught at the Fundação Getulio Vargas Business School and at the University of São Paulo, Brazil. He has also served visiting appointments at the MIP Business School, Politecnico di Milano (Italy), IPADE Business School (Mexico), University of Porto Business School (Portugal), IE Business School (Spain), FIA University of São Paulo and Fundação Dom Cabral Business School (Brazil), University of Warwick (UK), IESA (Venezuela), INCAE (Costa Rica), among other institutions. Dr. Correa has consulted with established companies such as Unilever, Ferrero Rocher, Conagra, Diageo, General Motors, Pepsico, Natura, Hewlett-Packard, Embraer, 3M, Brazil Foods, Whirlpool, Monsanto and InBev. 

He has published extensively in academic journals including the International Journal of Operations and Production Management, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, International Journal of Logistics Systems Management, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, International Journal of Operational Research, Expert Systems with Applications and Latin America Business Review. Dr. Correa has also authored and co-authored fifteen books and textbooks in the fields of operations strategy, service operations, operations management, project management and governance and global supply chain management. Dr Correa is currently in the top two list of most cited authors in Rollins College, according to Google Scholar. 

Dr. Correa served as the VP for the Americas in the Production Operations Management Society from 2005 to 2007 and VP of Communications from 2014 to 2017. He also served on the editorial board of the International Journal of Operations and Production Management for 16 years and is certified in production and inventory management (CPIM) by APICS. He was the 2011-2012 recipient of the Rollins College Bornstein Award for Faculty Scholarship and the 2017-2018 Rollins College Cornell Distinguished Faculty in Crummer. 

Research & Articles

European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier | Volume 298, Issue3, 1 May 2022, Pp. 967-978.

The value efficiency approach is one possible way of incorporating information preferences into performance analysis of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). In this paper, we propose a novel geometric interpretation of value efficiency while plugging it into radial and non-radial DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) models under the assumption of variable returns to scale. In addition, this novel geometric interpretation of value efficiency is extended to Additive Slacks-Based Measure (ASBM) modeling. This is achieved by linearization of non-radial DEA models using multi-objective programming. Performance of such proposed approaches in terms of reliability and discriminatory power are compared through a case study involving Finish bank branches. Research implications are then derived and conclusions are drawn.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.036

International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 2023. 18:1, pp. 51-64

This study examines critical success factors (CSFs) for supply chain resilience regarding the selection of transportation service providers. Due to extensive global sourcing, many companies are dependent on multiple suppliers and service providers. Using a Delphi approach, this article identifies the CSFs relevant to the resilience of transportation service providers in supply chains. A novel approach using Multiple Criteria Decision-Analysis (MCDA) is then developed to rank a group of CSFs. In particular, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Multi-attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) methods are used to rank resilience-related CSFs for transportation service providers in uncertain environments using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (HFS). Based on our results, hybrid MCDA methods can be applied in order to develop an effective method for determining resilience-related CSFs when selecting transportation service providers in uncertain environments.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2098543

Mathematics. 12(12) 1865, 2024

Utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors to rank countries according to these criteria aims to evaluate and prioritize countries based on their performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects. The contemporary world is influenced by a multitude of factors, which consequently impact our lives. Various models are devised to assess company performance, with the intention of enhancing quality of life. An exemplary case is the ESG framework, encompassing environmental, social, and governmental dimensions. Implementing this framework is intricate, and many nations are keen on understanding their global ranking and avenues for enhancement. Different statistical and mathematical methods have been employed to represent these rankings. This research endeavors to examine both types of methods to ascertain the one yielding the optimal outcome. The ESG model comprises eleven factors, each contributing to its efficacy. We employ the Performance Contribution Analysis (PCA), Clifford algebra method, and entropy weight technique to rank these factors, aiming to identify the most influential factor in countries’ ESG-based rankings. Based on prioritization results, political stability (PSAV) and the voice of accountability (VA) emerge as pivotal elements. In light of the ESG model and MCDA methods, the following countries exhibit significant societal impact: Sweden, Finland, New Zealand, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Denmark, India, Norway, Canada, Germany, Austria, and Australia. This research contributes in two distinct dimensions, considering the global context and MCDA methods employed. Undoubtedly, a research gap is identified, necessitating the development of a novel model for the comparative evaluation of countries in relation to prior studies.

https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121865